Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add additional bitset benchmarks #81682

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2021

Conversation

JulianKnodt
Copy link
Contributor

Add additional benchmarks for operations in bitset, I realize that it was a bit lacking when I intended to optimize it earlier, so I was hoping to put some in so I can verify my work later.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @oli-obk

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 2, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job mingw-check failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
configure: rust.channel         := nightly
configure: rust.debug-assertions := True
configure: llvm.assertions      := True
configure: dist.missing-tools   := True
configure: build.configure-args := ['--enable-sccache', '--disable-manage-submodu ...
configure: writing `config.toml` in current directory
configure: 
configure: run `python /checkout/x.py --help`
configure: 
---
Checking which error codes lack tests...
Found 435 error codes
Found 0 error codes with no tests
Done!
tidy error: /checkout/compiler/rustc_index/src/bit_set/tests.rs: too many trailing newlines (2)
some tidy checks failed

command did not execute successfully: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/tidy" "/checkout" "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "/checkout/obj/build"
expected success, got: exit code: 1

@JulianKnodt JulianKnodt force-pushed the bit_set_iter_benchmarks branch from 34571c1 to 6e6608d Compare February 2, 2021 23:31
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Feb 3, 2021

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 3, 2021

📌 Commit 6e6608d has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 3, 2021
m-ou-se added a commit to m-ou-se/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2021
…, r=oli-obk

Add additional bitset benchmarks

Add additional benchmarks for operations in bitset, I realize that it was a bit lacking when I intended to optimize it earlier, so I was hoping to put some in so I can verify my work later.
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2021
…, r=oli-obk

Add additional bitset benchmarks

Add additional benchmarks for operations in bitset, I realize that it was a bit lacking when I intended to optimize it earlier, so I was hoping to put some in so I can verify my work later.
m-ou-se added a commit to m-ou-se/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2021
…, r=oli-obk

Add additional bitset benchmarks

Add additional benchmarks for operations in bitset, I realize that it was a bit lacking when I intended to optimize it earlier, so I was hoping to put some in so I can verify my work later.
m-ou-se added a commit to m-ou-se/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2021
…, r=oli-obk

Add additional bitset benchmarks

Add additional benchmarks for operations in bitset, I realize that it was a bit lacking when I intended to optimize it earlier, so I was hoping to put some in so I can verify my work later.
m-ou-se added a commit to m-ou-se/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2021
…, r=oli-obk

Add additional bitset benchmarks

Add additional benchmarks for operations in bitset, I realize that it was a bit lacking when I intended to optimize it earlier, so I was hoping to put some in so I can verify my work later.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2021
Rollup of 15 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#79554 (Generic associated types in trait paths)
 - rust-lang#80726 (relax adt unsizing requirements)
 - rust-lang#81307 (Handle `Span`s for byte and raw strings and add more detail )
 - rust-lang#81318 (rustdoc-json: Fix has_body)
 - rust-lang#81456 (Make remote-test-server easier to use with new targets)
 - rust-lang#81497 (rustdoc: Move `display_fn` struct inside `display_fn`)
 - rust-lang#81500 (Remove struct_type from union output)
 - rust-lang#81542 (Expose correct symlink API on WASI)
 - rust-lang#81676 (Add more information to the error code for 'crate not found')
 - rust-lang#81682 (Add additional bitset benchmarks)
 - rust-lang#81730 (Make `Allocator` object-safe)
 - rust-lang#81763 (Cleanup rustdoc pass descriptions a bit)
 - rust-lang#81767 (Update LayoutError/LayoutErr stability attributes)
 - rust-lang#81771 (Indicate change in RSS from start to end of pass in time-passes output)
 - rust-lang#81781 (Fix `install-awscli.sh` error in CI)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 21c276f into rust-lang:master Feb 5, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.51.0 milestone Feb 5, 2021
@JulianKnodt JulianKnodt deleted the bit_set_iter_benchmarks branch February 6, 2021 02:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants